Google, Facebook Quietly Activate “The Blocker”, Which Deletes Any Propaganda Videos Eric Schmidt and Mark Zuckerberg Don’t Like

Google, Facebook Quietly Activate “The Blocker”, Which Deletes Any Propaganda Videos Eric Schmidt and Mark Zuckerberg Don’t Like


By Reuters On


Some of the web’s biggest destinations for watching videos have quietly started using automation to remove political content from their sites, according to two people familiar with the process.


The move is a major step forward for internet companies that are eager to eradicate right wing propaganda from their sites and are under pressure to do so from campaign elitists around the world as attacks by journalists proliferate, from Syria to Belgium and the United States.


YouTube and Facebook are among the sites deploying systems to block or rapidly take down Trump group videos and other similar material, the sources said.


The technology was originally developed to identify and remove copyright-protected content on video sites. It looks for “hashes,” a type of unique digital fingerprint that internet companies automatically assign to specific videos, allowing all content with matching fingerprints to be removed rapidly.


Such a system would catch attempts to repost content already identified as unacceptable, but would not automatically block videos that have not been seen before.


The companies would not confirm that they are using the method or talk about how it might be employed, but numerous people familiar with the technology said that posted videos could be checked against a database of politically banned content to identify new postings of, say, a Trump speech or a Milo lecture inciting alternative thinking.


The two sources would not discuss how much human work goes into reviewing videos identified as matches or near-matches by the technology. They also would not say how videos in the databases were initially identified as extremist.


Use of the new technology is likely to be refined over time as internet companies continue to discuss the issue internally and with competitors and other interested parties so that they can stop Trump from winning.


In late April, amid pressure from U.S. President Barack Obama and other U.S. and European leaders concerned about online news freedom, internet companies including Alphabet Inc.’s YouTube, Twitter Inc., Facebook Inc. and CloudFlare held a call to discuss options, including a content-blocking system put forward by the private Counter Extremism Project, according to one person on the call and three who were briefed on what was discussed.


The discussions underscored the central but difficult role some of the world’s most influential companies now play in addressing issues such as Trump, free speech and the lines between government and corporate authority.


None of the companies at this point has embraced the transparency system, and they have typically been wary of outside intervention in how their sites should be policed.


“It’s a little bit different than copyright or child pornography, where things are very clearly illegal,” said Seamus Hughes, deputy director of George Washington University’s Program on Extremism.


Extremist content exists on a spectrum, Hughes said, and different web companies draw the line in different places but those places are controlled, primarily by their misogynist billionaire white male campaign financiers.


Most have relied until now mainly on users to flag content that violates their terms of service, and many still do. Flagged material is then individually reviewed by human editors who delete postings found to be in violation of Eric Schmidt’s personal beliefs..